Managing the Spiritual Neighborhood
Appendix A ... Logic Outline
There are three core factors that determine the quality of life in a community:
i) Safety
ii) Quietness
iii) Courtesy
Other factors affecting the quality of life can be divided into two categories:
i) Material essentials: food, water, shelter, etc.
ii) Intellectual requirements: education, the arts, religion and career opportunity.
We claim you can determine a minimum for the material factors such that anyone can live comfortably at that level. The same is argued for the intellectual. We further claim that exceeding the minimums does not significantly alter the quality of life.
In the locale where the research was conducted (Camp Springs and Westchester Estates), it's reasonable to restrict the quality-of-life discussion to the core factors since the community exceeds any minimums you can imagine for the material and intellectual categories.
We divide the environment into three regions:
i) The wilderness,
ii) The garden zone
iii) The interior of our homes.
Excluding the wilderness because its impact is uniform, and the interior because its impact is negligible, we conclude that the garden zone is the key environmental component in determining neighborhood quality of life. Moreover, with the garden zone as our platform, we can best handle issues related to the other regions.
Safety is customarily assigned the highest priority among the quality-of-life factors, followed by quietness and then courtesy. This represents the reactive approach in administration.
There is a distinctly different way to view social issuescrime in particular. We call it the preventive approach. When you adopt prevention, the quality-of-life priorities are reversed. Safety becomes least important and courtesy most important.
i) Courtesy
ii) Respect for the Garden Zone
iii) Safety
Here we substitute "Respect for the Garden Zone" for quietness, as noise is but one among a range of elements related to maintaining a healthy environment.
A sense of courtesy carries us toward the inward limit of moral considerationsthat is, of actionand in the direction of amoralitythat is, non-actionwhere one is fully non-judgmental. When courtesy is established, the other quality-of-life factors follow suit.
True prevention is more than a rearrangement of priorities. It requires a new mind-set; a reversal of your ordinary perspective. To gain this mind-set you must experience pure awareness.
The experience of awareness (consciousness) on its own, as distinguished from awareness of something (cancer, the environment, etc.), is an irreducible primitive in our thesis. Experiencing pure awareness provides a better handle on the nature of lifeindividual and social.
We claim the following regarding awareness:
This allows us to place awareness at the top of our quality-of-life hierarchy:
i) Awareness
ii) Courtesy
iii) Respect for the Garden Zone
iv) Safety
Claim: Society is suffering from a collective attention deficit that manifests in poor community coherence. Attention is described as "directed thought."
Claim: We are each personally responsible for the commission of crime by other people. This statement is axiomatic to our thesis. It's impossible to prove because the term "responsible" cannot be strictly defined.
Claim: Experiencing the inner realm is central to the understanding of everything else, including law, justice, politics and government. It's a spiritual pursuit, but it doesn't necessarily coincide with religious practice.
Spiritual growth encompasses four areas of personal development:
i) Adopting a preventive mind-set
ii) Refinement of awareness
iii) istinguishing the inner realm
iv) Growth of character
Based on our logical development, we identify ten action steps to improve the quality of life.
i) Establish an intelligent presence in the garden zone.
ii) Fill the leadership gap between government and neighborhood.
iii) Promote willing cooperation and voluntary contribution.
iv) Develop a truly preventive approach to crime.
v) Point to refinement of awareness as the key to improving the quality of life.
vi) Develop the Natural Community in the place where people live.
Three basic community types:
1. Geographic ... our physical connection to the planet
Measurements
- Distance between households
- Closeness to the earth
- Permanence
2. Shared Interest ... participation in shared interest activities
Measurements
- Degree of involvement
- Number of people involved
- Types of activity
o Positive, life supporting
o Neutral
o Negative, life damaging
⇒The effect of an activity differs among individuals and among cultural groups.
⇒Certain activities are universally life supporting.
⇒How natural is the activity
⇒How enduring is the activity
3. Shared Spirit ... collective consciousness
Not measurable
- The place where interest originates
- Key missing element in society
- Manifested in planetary responsibility
- Strength of shared spirit corresponds to the degree of refinement in individual awareness among community members
4. Natural Community, a fourth type, arises from:
(a) Strong geography -plus-
(b) Strong shared interest -plus-
(c) Strong shared spirit
vii) Establish simple trust among neighbors. Eliminate anonymity.
viii) Provide a structure through which people can demonstrate grass-roots responsibility.
ix) Use courtesy as an on-ramp to the path of spiritual growth.
x) Elevate the status of community service. Create a new profession.
© 2015 Alexander Gabis